ABSTRACT
Abstract This study investigated the influence of different processing methods on the oral toxicity of Sophora alopecuroides L., Fabaceae, seeds in mice and on the contents of five known toxic-effective quinolizidine alkaloids from the ethanol extracts quantified by ultra-performance liquid chromatography coupled to tandem quadrupole mass spectrometry. It provides an evidence to elucidate the possible reasons why vinegar-processing and parching methods significantly decrease the acute oral toxicity induced by S. alopecuroides and why wine-processing method increases it instead (demonstrated by measurement of LD50 and histopathological analysis). The analytical performance for the determination of the five analytes was evaluated by linearity, stability, repeatability, precision and accuracy, and recovery test. The lowest limit of quantification was determined to be 5 ng/ml for each substance and the precision and accuracy at lowest limit of quantification were below 20%. Cytisine, the most toxic alkaloid among the five alkaloids, declined 11.26, 3.98, and 2.73 folds after being vinegar-processed and fried in a ceramic or iron pan, respectively and had a very close correlation with the toxicity of S. alopecuroides seeds (r = 0.8589). Other matrine-type alkaloids with lower toxicity including matrine, sophcarpine, and sophoridine decreased after being wine-processed and fried in a ceramic pan, but increased 4.44, 7.20, and 7.23 folds when being processed by vinegar. Oxymatrine declined in all groups. It, therefore, reveals that vinegar-processing method reduces the oral toxicity of S. alopecuroides mainly due to a sharp decrease of cytisine, thus improves its clinical safety.
ABSTRACT
Objective: To investigate the mechanism of quinacridine alkaloids based on the systematic of screening compounds that play antitumor effect. Methods: The virtual screening technique was used and collected 103 quinolizidine alkaloids from Leguminosae plants, and selected eight targets, which were closely related to angiogenesis. The compounds were screened by using the LibDock module in Discovery Studio 2.5 (DS 2.5) software. In addition, the small-molecule approved drugs of targets from DrugBank database have scores, the minimum score of each target's approved drugs as threshold and the original ligand scoring were set as a reference. Results: Nineteen compounds were screened out, which scores were higher than the minimum score of approved drugs as well as being in the top of 10%, and the mechanism of quinolizidine alkaloids anti-angiogenesis was preliminarily revealed. Conclusion: The results suggest that the quinolizidine alkaloids may inhibit angiogenesis to play the role of antitumor, diabetic vascular complications and so on. Compared with traditional screening, virtual screening technology saves a lot of time, energy and resources, provided a new method for the development of angiogenesis inhibitor drugs.
ABSTRACT
Twelve quinolizidine alkaloids were isolated from Sophora tonkinensis by means of silica gel, preparative MPLC, and preparative HPLC. On analysis of NMR spectroscopic data, their structures were established as 3-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-4-(3-methoxy-4-hydroxyphenyl)-3,4-dehydroquinolizidine(1), lanatine A(2), cermizines C(3), senepodines G(4), senepodines H(5), jussiaeiines A(6), jussiaeiines B(7),(+)-5α-hydroxyoxysophocarpine(8),(-)-12β-hydroxyoxysophocarpine(9),(-)-clathrotropine(10),(-)-cytisine(11), and (-)-N-methylcytisine(12), respectively. Compounds 1-7 were first isolated from Sophora L. plant. In the in vitro assays,the isolated compounds 1, 3, 6-10 exhibited potent activity against CVB3 with IC₅₀ of 6.40, 3.25, 4.66, 3.21, 0.12, 0.23 and 1.60, and with selective index values(SI=TC₅₀/IC₅₀)of 12.0, 5.6, 13.0, 15.1, 50.1, 26.2, and 23.6, respectively. Compounds 1, 3, and 7 exhibited activity against staphylococcus aureus(ATCC 29213)with MICvalues of 8.0, 3.5, 6.0 g•L⁻¹, respectively. Compounds 1, 3, 7, and 12 exhibited activity against staphylococcus aureus(ATCC 33591)with MIC values of 18.0, 7.5, 8.0, 12.0 g•L⁻¹, respectively. Compounds 2, 6, 7 exhibited activity against Escherichia coli(ATCC 25922) with MIC values of 1.0, 3.2, 0.8 g•L⁻¹.